by Mona Shaw
You can be
certain of this. We will never get traction on the road to justice until we
address class as a cultural construction in the United States
Classism
in this nation is so prevalent and so insidious that we don’t see it for the most
part.
It emerges
in countless ways. It’s there when a social justice activist adds their Ivy League or academic credentials to their activist resumes—as if those credentials are germane.
It’s present when a parent brags about their child getting into Harvard. It’s the primary driver in making fun of
Country Music or overweight people who wear tight clothes. It takes place every
single time stories of “success” are predicated on accomplishments that involve
economic gain or status.
The
purpose of classism is to identify an “unworthy other.” It selects a population
that is worthy of ridicule and contempt. It delights in blaming this population
for everything worthy of disdain.
This is no
more apparent than in images and memes that are employed that mock these
people. There are entire websites with the sole purpose of humiliating these
people. People of Walmart is one.
The past
three years it has become tragically popular to construct memes of poor people who
support Trump. These memes are almost always Photoshopped by someone who doesn’t
the know the person in the meme. They
just know the person is missing teeth or overweight or wearing stereotypical
underclass clothing.
By
choosing these people for these memes, they target anyone for persecution that
may resemble these people. They suggest
there is something inherently “bad” about people missing teeth or have other
attributes of people who are impoverished.
If this
weren’t the intent, we would see more anti-Trump memes featuring the wealthy
class playing golf with Trump at Maralago, but that doesn't happen. Of course this plays
right into Trumpish hands. It leads to
the condemnation of the poor and takes it away from the abuses of the wealthy where
it belongs. Since the poor have no institutional power whatsoever, choosing them as culpable for Trump is astonishingly short-sighted.
To address
the obvious classism in these memes leads to a convoluted and exhausting
discussion that employs the least creative tactics of apologists of bigotry of
all kinds.
“That’s
not what I meant by that.”
“I’m poor,
and it doesn’t bother me.”
“A lot of poor
people are like that.”
“Stop
being self-righteous.” Or “condescending,” “purist,” etc.
“You lose any
point you may have had by your attitude, how you brought this up, when you
brought this up, where you brought this up, etc.”
“This is
an example of ‘political correctness’ going too far.”
Just
insert “person of color,” “LGBT person,” or “woman,” and this will become
familiar.
There is
no oppression that is more difficult to discuss than classism. Too many see it
as a “detail” rather than a serious and deadly oppression. No one is perfect,
after all. And classism is the oppression we are most inclined to give a pass.
Calling
out classism is the oppression that incurs accusations of minimizing other
oppressions simply by bringing it up. This is a preposterous fear because
objecting to any oppression can only serve to diminish any other
oppression. It is self-defeating given
that other oppressed groups are more vulnerable to class oppression as well.
In this
culture we have constructed a culture in which we base our worth as it compares
to the worth of another. We find it immensely
difficult to interact without knowing each other’s social class. We have many
social clues for this. How someone talks. How they dress. Where they work. Our ingrained
interest in and deference to celebrities. Our admiration of the customs of the
affluent from how they set a table, where they vacation, what they eat, or how
they decorate their homes.
We don’t
know how to have an identity or value unless we can look down on those who do
these things “wrong.”
I left an “Occupy”
event in Washington D.C. in 2011, after I witnessed two things.
The first
was when “core” organizers were protective of Ralph Nader when he visited our
camp. His celebrity warranted special treatment and not allowing the
proletariat too close for too long.
The second
was when “core” organizers determined that we should allow homeless folks in
the neighborhood to eat at the camp food tent.
“We need
this food for us.” they said.
I knew
then I didn’t belong there. I was not one the “us.”
I agree
with Eugene V. Debs.
“While there is
a lower class, I am in it, while there is a criminal element, I am of it, and
while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.”
You don’t build
solidarity by mocking the targets of class oppression. They are our hope. The
effective justice movement can only be led by the “least of these” in society.
It will be led by a toothless fat woman in tight, stained, stretch pants. I’m ready to follow her. I’m certainly not
going to mock her.
No comments:
Post a Comment